More content to inform you
Réseaux de distribution, Concurrence
The Court of Cassation specifies the criteria for denigration constituting an abuse of a dominant position
In the Lucentis/Avastin case, the Commercial Chamber has just delivered an interesting judgment that redefines the contours of the denigration constituting an abuse of a dominant position.
Réseaux de distribution, Concurrence
Termination of commercial relationship: clarifications on the rules of notice
The Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for assessing notice in the event of termination of a commercial relationship, stressing the importance of the duration of the relationship and economic dependence. An essential analysis for companies concerned with securing their contractual practices.
Réseaux de distribution, Concurrence
Business Breakdown: Parent Company Liability and Partner Dependency
The Paris Court of Appeal ruled on the responsibility of the parent company of the author for a sudden termination of the commercial relations established in the event of interference by the latter in the management of his daughter and the criteria to be taken into account in the event of economic dependence of the partner.
Réseaux de distribution, Concurrence
Anti-Competitive Practices and Jurisdiction
The Paris Court of Appeal has sole jurisdiction to hear disputes relating to restrictive competition practices and anti-competitive practices.
Réseaux de distribution, Concurrence
Restrictive competition practices and international public policy
Does the law of restrictive practices belong to international public policy or not?
Réseaux de distribution, Concurrence
Minister's Action: Enhanced evidentiary requirements for subjecting to significant imbalance
The Court of Appeal clarifies its evidentiary requirements regarding proof of submission in the event of action by the Minister of Economy on the basis of significant imbalance.
Réseaux de distribution, Concurrence
Significant imbalance: details of the Minister's action
The Paris Court of Appeal reaffirms the civil tort nature of the Minister's action under domestic law.
