contrôle DGCCRF

New DGCCRF guidelines on payment terms

The agents of the DGCCRF are authorized to search for and note breaches of the regulations on payment terms between companies and in public procurement contracts. In the event of exceeding a maximum period, it may in particular impose an administrative fine of up to 2 million euros or, in the event of repetition within two years, 4 million euros .  

The agents of the DGCCRF are authorized to search for and note breaches of the regulations on payment terms between companies and in public procurement contracts. In the event of exceeding a maximum period, it may in particular impose an administrative fine of up to 2 million euros or, in the event of repetition within two years, 4 million euros .  

The DGCCRF has clarified and completed its guidelines on the modalities of its controls for the respect of payment deadlines between professionals.  

The revised guidelines detail the extent of its control and the arguments that can be put forward to evade punishment. 

On the progress of the control, it is now specified that the transmissions of information and documents can be done remotely , the list of Documents of which the agents can request communication is completed, and the fact that the controls cover, with exceptions, a period of one year corresponding to the last financial year closed.  

The novelty is that its guidelines clarify the arguments that the DGCCRF does not consider as influencing its analysis and also the exonerating causes in case of late payment. 

The lines specify that the author of a late payment cannot usefully put forward the following arguments: 
 

  • its good faith, provided that no intentional element is required to characterize a breach; 
  • in principle, an accounting system that is irregularly kept (C. corn. art. L 123-23); 
  • the fact that the invoice does not include a legal or contractual mention (as long as it indicates enough elements to allow the buyer to verify the merits of his debt (CEPC opinion n° 19-11 of September 19, 2019);
     
  • the supplier’s agreement to be settled beyond the deadline, provided that the regulation is of public order; 
  • an average payment period below the legal ceiling, since payments before the legal deadline cannot compensate for exceedances of the ceiling, even if they concern the same suppliers;
     
  • difficulties related to the internal invoice processing process, as the supplier does not have to suffer the consequences.  

On the other hand, the buyer can claim: 
 

  • the existence of a duly justified dispute relating to a significant part of the service or goods concerned; 
  • the late transmission of the invoice, provided that the buyer, co-responsible for the issuance of this invoice (art. L 441-9), proves that he raised the seller at least once before the legal deadline;
     
  • the fact that the invoice has been the subject of a credit note whose amount covers the entire amount of the invoice.  

On the quantum of the fine, the DGCCRF recalls that the basic amount of the fine, which will then be adjusted according to the circumstances of the breach, is calculated by adding the gains in working capital requirements (WCR) by relating the amount of the invoice to the number of days of delay over the controlled period.

Discover our related services and tools

contrôle répression des fraudes

Products, Consumption, Advertising

Economic Administration Controls (Fraud Repression or DGCCRF)

You are the subject of a fraud control (DGCCRF, DIRECCTE, DDPP or DDCSPP) or have just been informed by the latter of a future control.

Faced with this situation, you need to:
• Put in place a methodology to respond effectively to this control,
• Prepare your interlocutors,
• Respond to notifications,
• Challenge any visit operations and sanctions.

You are the subject of a fraud control (DGCCRF, DIRECCTE, DDPP or DDCSPP) or have just been informed by the latter of a future control.

Faced with this situation, you need to:
• Put in place a methodology to respond effectively to this control,
• Prepare your interlocutors,
• Respond to notifications,
• Challenge any visit operations and sanctions.

And resources on the same topic: "Control DGCCRF Consumption"

Produits, Consommation, Publicité

Focus on the new transparency obligations of the Eco-design Regulation

Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 of 13 June 2024 lays down new transparency requirements for economic operators concerning the management of unsold items and the provision of a digital passport.

Produits, Consommation, Publicité

Publication of priority areas for the application of the Eco-design Regulation

In a publication of 16 April 2025, the European Commission established the list of priorities for the years 2025-2030 for the implementation of the Eco-design Regulation of 13 June 2024.  

Produits, Consommation, Publicité

Can an unfair practice form the basis of an action for unfair competition

In a judgment of 14 May 2025, the Court of Cassation questioned the possibility of bringing an action for unfair competition relating to a commercial practice, with no direct link to the consumer, whereas this practice would not substantially alter the consumer's economic behaviour.  

Produits, Consommation, Publicité

Compensation for damage suffered in unfair competition through the assessment of loss of profits

In a judgment of 2 April 2025, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled on the assessment of the economic damage resulting from acts of unfair competition by taking into account the loss of income.

Contact our lawyers

First needs assessment appointment free of charge