Can an article aimed at a competitor characterize a deceptive commercial practice
This is the question that has just been answered by the Paris Court of Appeal, in a judgment delivered on 14 March 2025 (RG No.22/16356), in the context of a dispute between the company La Capsule, the companies La Loco and Le Wagon, competitors in the sector of training in computer coding.
The dispute originated in the publication of an anonymous article criticizing the trainings offered by Le Wagon. Having identified the executives of the Capsule as the owners of the domain name of the website on which the disputed article had been published in the form of a testimony from a person posing as a former student, the targeted company had requested the deletion of the article from its competitor, to which it had been acquiesced, and compensation for the damage suffered, a request which had not been granted.
The Wagon and La Loco had appealed to the Commercial Court of Paris, which had issued a judgment on 9 September 2022, under the terms of which it had found La Capsule guilty of Unfair commerciales practices, prohibiting her from republishing the disputed article entitled without removing the false information, and ordering her to pay 10,000 euros in compensation for the damage suffered.
The company La Capsule then appealed this judgment.
The Court of Appeal upheld in part the decision of the Commercial Court of Paris, while reversing it on certain aspects.
The Court held that the publication of an anonymous article containing false information on Le Wagon’s formations, without identifying the person for whom this publication was made, constituted an unfair and deceptive business practice. She notes: “ It therefore appears that, as the respondent companies rightly maintain, the publication in question does not contain the necessary elements identifying La Capsule as the person on whose behalf the article “Geekupyourlife” was published, in contravention of the provisions of Article L. 121-2 3° mentioned above which provides “A commercial practice is misleading if it is committed in one of the following circumstances: 3° When the person on whose behalf it is implemented is not clearly identifiable. “
The Court also held that the false information contained in the article: “cmajor inconveniences result in misleading the consumer about the essential characteristics of the computer coding training provided by the respondents. The company La Capsule was guilty of misleading commercial practice within the meaning of Article L. 121-2, 2° b) ».
The Court held that La Capsule had committed acts of unfair competition by seeking to divert customers from its competitors through this article noting that: “lthe appellant company has committed acts of unfair competition to the detriment of the companies Le Wagon and La Loco by wanting to divert this clientele, interested in competing training, towards their own training but without providing them with objective elements allowing them to make their choice. The companies Le Wagon and La Loco have therefore suffered economic and image damage related to the wrongful acts of La Capsule. »
On the assessment of the damage, the Court noted the relevance of the methodology used, including the number of visits to the article, the conversion rate found between readings and applications, but applied a discount by limiting the damage to 40% of the estimated assessment.
This decision underlines the importance of fairness and transparency in business practices, and recalls that the dissemination of false or misleading information about competitors can constitute unfair trading practices and acts of unfair competition.
Guillaume Gouachon
Associate Lawyer
Discover our services and related tools
Products, Consumer, Advertising
Avoid qualifying as misleading advertising
Is your ad misleading?
• Secure ads from your marketing teams
• Avoid any civil or criminal sanctions in case of control
Is your ad misleading?
• Secure ads from your marketing teams
• Avoid any civil or criminal sanctions in case of control
Products, Consumer, Advertising
Set up comparative advertising
The use of comparative advertising is common, but borders with denigration or unfair commercial practices, making comparative advertising illegal, are sometimes tenuous.
Gouache Avocats supports you to secure your campaigns or defend yourself against the practices of your competitors.
The use of comparative advertising is common, but borders with denigration or unfair commercial practices, making comparative advertising illegal, are sometimes tenuous.
Gouache Avocats supports you to secure your campaigns or defend yourself against the practices of your competitors.
And resources on the same theme: "Misleading commercial practices"
Products, Consumer, Advertising
Advertising, promotions and consumer law: what the law says
In the interests of consumer protection, the legislator establishes a legislative framework relating to advertising communications and promotional commercial operations.
Products, Consumer, Advertising
The use of a competitor's trademark in a paid advertisement constitutes an act of infringement.
The firm has just obtained an interesting decision in a dispute concerning the unauthorized use of a client's brand in a paid advertisement published on a search engine to divert customers to its site. The Nancy Court of Justice has just condemned this competitor for the acts of infringement committed.
Products, Consumer, Advertising
Compensation for damage suffered in unfair competition through the assessment of loss of profits
In a judgment of 2 April 2025, the Paris Court of Appeal ruled on the assessment of the economic damage resulting from acts of unfair competition by taking into account the loss of income.
Products, Consumer, Advertising
The ban on the expressions “soy steaks” and “vegetable sausages” annulled
By two decisions of 28 January 2025, the Council of State aligned itself with the position of the CJEU by affirming the annulment of the decrees prohibiting the use of the expressions "soya steaks" and "vegetable sausages".